Decision Atlas
ORDOrders & serviceStop 1 of 9
  1. Order to delivery basics
  2. Order promising: ATP & CTP
  3. Allocation when supply is short
  4. Substitution
  5. Control tower & S&OE
  6. Order visibility & analytics
  7. Returns management
  8. Service parts planning
  9. AI in customer service

Order to delivery basics

Everything that happens between a customer's order and the delivery at their door, and the measures that show whether it worked.

3 min gist, 9 min in full Draft, review pending

Read atChange any time

The sell-side mirror of procurement, from order to cash in the bank.

When a supermarket chain orders 500 cases of shampoo, a chain of steps starts. Together they’re called order to cash (O2C), the sell-side mirror of procure-to-pay:

  1. Order capture: the order arrives by EDI, a portal, a sales rep’s app or email, and is checked for price, pack sizes and delivery date.
  2. Credit check: is the customer within its credit limit?
  3. Availability check: can we promise the quantity and date? (That’s ATP.)
  4. Allocation: if stock is short, who gets it?
  5. Delivery creation and picking: the warehouse picks and packs the order.
  6. Goods issue and shipping: stock leaves the building; ownership and cost of goods sold are booked.
  7. Proof of delivery: the customer confirms receipt, quantities and condition.
  8. Billing and payment: invoice, collection, and clearing the customer’s account.

Things go wrong at every hand-off: a price mismatch blocks the order, a credit hold delays it, a picking error ships the wrong pack, a missed truck turns “on time” into “late”. That’s why companies measure the whole chain, not just the warehouse:

  • Order cycle time: order received to order delivered.
  • OTIF: share of orders delivered on time and in full.
  • Perfect order rate: on time, complete, undamaged and with correct paperwork and invoice. Because it multiplies several conditions, it’s always lower than any single measure.

Words to use

Order to cash (O2C)
The end-to-end process from receiving a customer order to collecting payment.
Perfect order rate
Share of orders that are on time, complete, undamaged and correctly documented.
Proof of delivery (POD)
The customer’s confirmation that goods arrived, in what quantity and condition.

Where order cycle time really goes, how OTIF and the perfect order are calculated, and backward scheduling from the requested date.

Where the time goes

Worked example: one order's 53 hours
StepHoursMostly
Order capture and checks1Work
Credit check, including holds3Waiting
Availability check and allocation1Work
Waiting for the picking wave6Waiting
Picking and packing2Work
Waiting for the truck8Waiting
Transit30Moving
Unloading and proof of delivery2Work

Of the 21 hours before the truck leaves, only about 4 are work; the rest is waiting for a credit release, a picking wave or a truck. Cutting those waits usually shortens the cycle more than speeding up any single task.

OTIF and the perfect order

OTIF counts an order as a success only if it arrives on time and complete. The perfect order adds more conditions: undamaged, with correct documents and a correct invoice. Because every condition must hold, the rate is roughly the product of the individual rates:

0.96×0.97×0.99×0.98≈0.900.96 \times 0.97 \times 0.99 \times 0.98 \approx 0.90

Four measures that each look good (96% on time, 97% in full, 99% undamaged, 98% correct paperwork) give only about 90% perfect orders.

Backward scheduling

To deliver on the requested date, the system works backwards: requested delivery date, minus transit time, gives the goods-issue date; minus loading time gives the loading date; minus picking and packing time gives the date the stock must be available. If stock won’t be available by then, the system works forwards from the earliest availability date and proposes a new delivery date.

Measuring against the requested date, order management design, differentiated service, and what retailers' OTIF penalties change.

On time to what?

“On time” can be measured against the date the customer requested or the date the company promised. Measuring against the promised date flatters performance: if the company promises late dates, it can be “on time” while customers wait longer than they wanted. Track both, and treat the gap between requested and promised dates as a measure of its own.

Designing order management

  • Order channels: EDI (electronic data interchange) messages from large customers, portals and apps for smaller ones, each validated automatically against prices, pack sizes and delivery rules.
  • Credit management: automatic release for low-risk customers and small amounts, with holds reviewed quickly; a credit hold that sits overnight can cost the delivery date.
  • Order prioritization: when resources are short, rules decide which orders are picked and shipped first.
  • Backorders: clear rules for partial shipments, backorders and cancellations, agreed with customers in advance.

Differentiated service

Not every customer needs the same promise. Companies segment customers and set different delivery times, order cut-offs and minimum order sizes, priced into the commercial terms. A key retailer may get daily deliveries with tight windows; a small distributor, twice-weekly deliveries. Designing these promises deliberately, rather than serving everyone the same way, controls the cost to serve.

When customers measure you

Large retailers score suppliers on OTIF at their own warehouses, often within narrow delivery windows, and charge penalties for misses. That moves the definition of “on time” into the customer’s hands and makes accurate appointment booking, loading and transit as important as stock. Suppliers respond by measuring OTIF exactly as each key customer does, finding the causes of misses, and fixing the handful that dominate.

Interview kit

Practise it out loud

Answer each question yourself before opening the model answer.

Say it in 30 seconds

Order to delivery, the core of order to cash, runs from order capture through credit and availability checks, allocation, picking and packing, goods issue and shipping, proof of delivery, then billing and payment. Each hand-off can fail, so I’d measure end to end with order cycle time, OTIF and the perfect order rate, and use reason codes on failed orders to find the weakest step.

OTIF is 95% but customers still complain. What might be wrong?

OTIF may be measured against our promised date rather than the customer’s requested date, or at line level rather than order level. Other failures don’t show in OTIF at all: damage, wrong paperwork, invoice errors. The perfect order rate and the customer’s own measurements give a truer picture.

Why is the perfect order rate always lower than OTIF?

Because it requires every condition at once: on time, in full, undamaged and with correct documentation. If each is 95%, the combined rate is roughly 0.95 × 0.95 × 0.95 × 0.95, about 81%.

Connected stops

Where this idea feeds in, or gets its inputs from.

Sources and further reading

  1. Chopra, S. & Meindl, P. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson.
  2. Magal, S. R. & Word, J. (2012). Integrated Business Processes with ERP Systems. Wiley.
  3. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Pearson.

Reading settings

Saved on this device. Changes apply as you choose them.

Theme
Text size
Typeface for reading
Line spacing
Line length
Start each topic at

Deeper levels stay one click away whichever you choose.

Preview

Safety stock covers the surprises while you wait for a delivery. It grows with the square root of lead time, not with lead time itself.

Lines

↑ ↓ move ↵ open Topics marked “Soon” open their line