Decision Atlas
INVInventoryStop 10 of 11
  1. Why inventory exists
  2. How much to order: EOQ
  3. Safety stock & reorder points
  4. Service levels: CSL vs fill rate
  5. The newsvendor model
  6. Inventory segmentation (ABC-XYZ)
  7. Risk pooling & centralization
  8. Multi-echelon inventory (MEIO)
  9. Replenishment & deployment (DRP)
  10. Slow-moving & obsolete stock
  11. Postponement

Slow-moving & obsolete stock

Spotting stock that has stopped moving before it loses its value, and choosing the least costly way out.

3 min gist, 11 min in full Draft, review pending

Read atChange any time

How to find dead stock early and decide what to do with it.

Every warehouse collects stock that has stopped selling: phone cases for a model nobody buys any more, last season’s colours, spare parts for retired machines. Companies often call it SLOB (slow-moving and obsolete) or E&O (excess and obsolete).

The two words mean different things. Slow-moving stock still sells, just far slower than planned. Obsolete stock has no realistic future demand. Treating a slow mover as dead throws away value; treating dead stock as slow lets it lose value month after month.

Spotting it early is mostly arithmetic:

  • Ageing: how long since the item last moved?
  • Cover: how many months would current stock last at the current sales rate? 5,000 phone cases selling 20 a month is 250 months of cover, which is effectively obsolete.
  • Future demand: is the product being phased out or replaced?

Then choose the exit that recovers the most: stop reordering, move the stock to locations where it still sells, discount or bundle it, return it to the supplier, rework it, sell it to a liquidator, or scrap it. Waiting is rarely free, because value usually drops the longer stock sits.

Finance cares too: when stock is unlikely to sell at its book value, companies set aside a provision or write it down, which hits profit. Good planning prevents the problem upstream with careful phase-out plans, smaller first orders for new or uncertain items, and forecasts that notice when demand is dying.

Words to use

Days (months) of cover
Stock on hand ÷ average usage: how long current stock would last.
E&O / SLOB
Excess and obsolete, or slow-moving and obsolete: stock above any sensible future need.
Write-down
Reducing the book value of stock that will not sell at cost; it reduces reported profit.

Ageing buckets, cover and excess calculations, and the phone-case decision worked through in rupees.

Measure it the same way every month

  1. Ageing: days since the item last moved, in buckets such as 0–90, 91–180, 181–365 and over 365 days.
  2. Cover: how many months the stock would last, using the forecast for coming months where you have one, not just last year’s sales.
  3. Excess: stock above what you can reasonably use, such as everything beyond 12 months of forecast plus safety stock.
  4. At risk: items with a phase-out date, a replacement product or an engineering change, even if they still sell today.

Decide on the economics, not the original cost

What you paid is gone: it is a sunk cost. The decision compares what each option recovers now with what keeping the stock will cost from here on.

Worked example: 5,000 phone cases

The cases cost ₹150 each and sell 20 a month. Holding cost is 25% of value a year.

  • Keep 12 months of demand plus a small buffer, about 260 cases. The excess is 4,740 cases.
  • Holding one case for a year costs 25% of ₹150 = ₹37.50.
  • A liquidator offers ₹30 a case: 4,740 × ₹30 = ₹1,42,200 now.
  • Keeping a case one more year costs more (₹37.50) than selling it today recovers (₹30), and its value will keep falling. Sell the excess now.

The same arithmetic ranks the other exits: moving stock to a branch where it still sells, bundling it with a fast seller, returning it under a supplier agreement or reworking it, each net of handling and freight.

The accounting side

Inventory is carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value (NRV): the expected selling price minus the costs of selling. This is the rule in IAS 2 and in India’s Ind AS 2. If the excess cases will realistically fetch ₹30, their book value must come down from ₹150 to ₹30, a write-down of 4,740 × ₹120 = ₹5,68,800, which hits this period’s profit. Many companies also book a general provision based on ageing, for example a rising percentage of value for stock older than six, twelve and twenty-four months.

Where dead stock comes from, how to stop it at the source, and the forecasting methods that notice decline.

Where dead stock comes from

  • Launch optimism: first orders sized on hope, before any sales history exists.
  • Large minimums: a supplier’s minimum order or a long production run covers years of demand for a slow item.
  • Late phase-outs: purchasing keeps buying an item that product management has already replaced.
  • Engineering changes: a design change makes old parts unusable overnight.
  • Promotion leftovers and returns that never get sorted back into sellable stock.
  • Incentives: buyers rewarded for price discounts on large volumes, or sales teams inflating forecasts to secure supply.

Prevention beats clearance

  • Phase-in and phase-out plans: set a run-out date, stop replenishing once stock plus open orders covers expected demand to that date, and coordinate the switch to the replacement.
  • Smaller first buys for new or uncertain items, with quick re-orders once demand shows up.
  • Negotiate minimums, or pay a little more per unit for smaller lots on slow items; the holding saving often beats the price break.
  • Postponement and common components, so less stock is committed to variants that may not sell.
  • Range reviews that cut the tail of items selling little while adding complexity.

Forecasts that notice decline

Standard methods are slow to see a dying product. Simple exponential smoothing keeps forecasting the old level for a while, and Croston’s method updates its estimate only when a sale happens, so if sales stop entirely its forecast never falls. The TSB method (Teunter, Syntetos and Babai, 2011) updates the probability of demand every period instead, so a run of zeros steadily pulls the forecast down. That makes it well suited to items at risk of becoming obsolete.

Who owns it

Slow and obsolete stock sits between planning, sales, product management and finance, so it often belongs to nobody. Good practice is a monthly review with a named owner, clear authority to dispose, and targets for both prevention (new excess created) and clearance (old excess removed).

Interview kit

Practise it out loud

Answer each question yourself before opening the model answer.

Say it in 30 seconds

I’d separate slow movers, which still sell but too slowly, from obsolete stock with no realistic demand. Ageing, months of cover and the product’s lifecycle status flag them early. Then I choose the exit that recovers the most value: stop replenishment, transfer, promote or bundle, return to the supplier, rework, liquidate or scrap. Prevention matters more: phase-out planning, cautious buys for new items and forecasts that notice dying demand.

You find 5,000 units that sell 20 a month. What do you do?

That is 250 months of cover, effectively obsolete. Stop all replenishment immediately, check whether another region or channel still sells it, then compare the recovery from discounting, bundling, returning to the supplier or liquidating against the cost of keeping it. Provide for the expected loss in the books.

Why do standard forecasting methods struggle with dying products?

Croston’s method only updates its estimates when a sale happens, so when sales stop it keeps forecasting the old rate indefinitely. Simple exponential smoothing does drift down, but slowly. TSB updates the probability of demand every period, so its forecast falls steadily as the product dies and replenishment stops in time.

Connected stops

Where this idea feeds in, or gets its inputs from.

Sources and further reading

  1. Teunter, R. H., Syntetos, A. A. & Babai, M. Z. (2011). Intermittent demand: Linking forecasting to inventory obsolescence. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(3), 606–615.
  2. Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F. & Thomas, D. J. (2017). Inventory and Production Management in Supply Chains (4th ed.). CRC Press.
  3. IFRS Foundation. IAS 2 Inventories.

Reading settings

Saved on this device. Changes apply as you choose them.

Theme
Text size
Typeface for reading
Line spacing
Line length
Start each topic at

Deeper levels stay one click away whichever you choose.

Preview

Safety stock covers the surprises while you wait for a delivery. It grows with the square root of lead time, not with lead time itself.

Lines

↑ ↓ move ↵ open Topics marked “Soon” open their line